The definition of “knowledge” in English is pretty straightforward – To “know” something means being familiar and/or aware of it in a way that lets us understand. I find it fascinating that English has only one word for “knowledge”, where other languages use multiple words to reflect the depth and nuances of the concept. “Once widespread in Germanic, the verb [to know] is now retained there only in English, where it has widespread application, covering meanings that require two or more verbs in other languages (such as German wissen, kennen, erkennen and in part können; French connaître “perceive, understand, recognize,” savoir “have a knowledge of, know how;” etymonoline
How we understand “knowledge” affects how we teach, how we learn, and how we see the world.
The philosophers of Ancient Greece saw acquiring knowledge as an important part of the human quest for wisdom. Enter episteme, techne, phronesis, gnosis, and doxa. These nuanced ways to think about knowledge and wisdom have a lot to offer us as we navigate the misinformation and philosophical chaos of our time. For those in medicine, these nuanced definitions add beautiful complexity and understanding to our work, with special inspiration for those who teach the healing arts.
Episteme: Intellectual knowledge (Root of “epistemology”, the study of knowledge)
This is the information we learn in our classrooms, from books, and from teachers.
Techne: Technical knowledge (Root of “technology”)
Techne refers to the technical skills of a profession – the grasp of grammar for a writer, pedagogical skills for a teacher, the ability to perform specific procedures for a surgeon.
I recently read this remarkable essay by Sami Sinada in which he states: “Medical school teaches episteme. Residency builds techne. But phronesis? We assume it appears through osmosis. It doesn’t.”
The entire essay is well worth your time to read, but Dr. Sinada makes an important point – Our medical school and residency curricula have gaps when it comes to teaching practical wisdom (which is the core of doctoring). He goes on to argue that we can close that gap with five important pedagogical choices:
Start with uncertainty, not answers.
Prioritize continuity over episodic care.
Use ethical cases as judgement training.
Make expert reasoning audible.
Require reflective writing.
Doxa: Common belief, popular opinion. (Root of orthodox)
What strikes me about doxa is that it has no moral weight associated with it. Doxa can refer to the deep orthodoxy of thousands of years of tradition in a culture … everything from how we greet each other to what we believe… as well as culturally accepted, politically motivated lies.
Gnosis: Insight, deep personal knowing
Gnosis is most often associated with gnosticism, a religious and philosophical movement in the 2nd century. But I wonder if the concept of a deep inner knowing (whether or not you view that as divine) isn’t worth refurbishing for our time as an important way to “know”. Contemplation, meditation, prayer can all open spaces that defy our intellectual understanding, leading to a way of “knowing” that, in some ways, we need now more than ever.
Knowledge without transformation is not wisdom. Paulo Coelho